Work
online

Плюсы удаленки для тестировщика: минимизация выгорания, экономия и не только

Home » blog » Плюсы удаленки для тестировщика: минимизация выгорания, экономия и не только

The modern world of work has undergone significant changes, and the profession of a QA engineer is no exception. If just a few years ago working in an office was the norm, today remote work format for testers has become not just a trend, but a strategic choice. By 2025, every second QA specialist prefers to work not from an office desk, but from a comfortable chair in front of their laptop screen.

This decision is not driven by simple laziness or a desire to avoid commuting, but by specific, measurable advantages that directly impact productivity, work quality, and overall well-being of the specialist. Remote work opens up new opportunities for optimizing the work process and personal development, turning the standard “obligation” into a flexible and efficient environment for growth. Let’s take a closer look at why remote work has so many advantages for testers.

Gizbo

Time Savings and Improved Self-Organization

Working from home allows a tester to save 2–3 hours a day on commuting. That adds up to 660 hours a year, or over 80 full working days, which are reclaimed. This time can be directed towards learning, analysis, personal development, or additional projects.

Remote work requires strict discipline and time management, but with the right approach, it becomes a plus. Using timers (e.g., Pomodoro), digital calendars, and task management systems (Trello, Jira) helps to structure a clear workday. Autonomy and the ability to build one’s own work system become important competitive advantages.

Increased Concentration and Productivity – Key Benefits of Remote Work for Testers

Office noise and distracting factors can reduce concentration by up to 40%. Remote work allows creating an ideal environment: silence, comfort, and personal space. This is especially important for conducting regression testing, where it’s necessary to keep hundreds of conditions in mind. A Google QA specialist noted a 30% increase in productivity after switching to remote work.

Effective Communication and Teamwork

Remote work does not exclude teamwork dynamics; it makes it more purposeful. Tools like Zoom, Slack, and Notion enable productive discussions where each message and meeting have a clear goal. The number of empty conversations decreases, and the decision-making process speeds up. This is particularly relevant for international projects where a distributed model is the standard.

Ideal Workspace and Health Care

At home, you can customize your workspace to suit your needs: lighting, chair, monitor height, temperature. This not only improves mood but also has a positive impact on physical health. Testers report less back strain, better vision, and overall endurance.

Continuous Learning and Career Growth – an Important Benefit of Remote Work for Testers Aspiring for More

Remote work not only does not hinder development but also stimulates it. Remote specialists often dedicate time to learning new approaches, documentation, and online courses. They can easily join a webinar during lunch break or read a manual at a convenient time. On average, up to 4 hours a week are spent on learning, significantly more than in an office environment.

Significant Cost Savings

The absence of the need to commute to work, eat out, and spend on office attire leads to noticeable savings. The average QA engineer in the USA saves up to $4000 per year, and in the CIS – up to $1300 annually. These funds can be directed towards development, leisure, or investments.

Burnout Minimization and Access to Global Projects

Flexible schedule, absence of a toxic environment, and control over one’s space stabilize emotional well-being and reduce the risk of burnout. Studies show that remote employees are less likely to experience anxiety disorders.

Monro

The remote format provides access to international projects, allowing testers to participate in the development of systems worldwide. This offers the opportunity for global competition, where results are valued over location.

Benefits of Remote Work for Testers: Conclusion

The benefits of remote work for testers go beyond mere convenience. It is the foundation of productivity, professional growth, and autonomy. Flexibility, the ability to focus, and access to global opportunities create an environment where the quality of a QA specialist’s work naturally improves. The remote model ceases to be just a format – it becomes part of professional identity, allowing for development precisely, confidently, and without limitations.

Related posts

The IT industry continues to actively develop, creating thousands of job openings for specialists in various fields. Among the in-demand professions, QA Engineer remains. This specialist is responsible for ensuring the quality of digital products, preventing errors, and identifying vulnerabilities before release to the market.

But is it worth studying to become a tester in 2025 when technologies are becoming automated, and competition in the job market is increasing? What prospects await newcomers? The answer to this question requires a detailed analysis of the market, demand for specialists, salary levels, and future trends.

Starda

Demand for the profession: Is it worth studying to become a tester in 2025

IT companies are paying increasing attention to the quality of products, making testing a critically important stage of development. According to the Statista report, by 2025, global spending on software quality control will exceed $60 billion, indicating a growing need for qualified engineers.

The labor market also confirms this trend:

  1. USA — QA job openings have increased by 11% over the past two years (Glassdoor data).
  2. Europe — demand for testing specialists has increased by 15% in 2023-2024 (Eurostat study).
  3. Russia and CIS — on hh.ru and LinkedIn, the number of open positions in the niche is around 8,000 vacancies, with an average salary ranging from 100,000 to 250,000 rubles depending on qualifications.

Despite the development of automated testing, it is impossible to completely replace manual methods. Hybrid approaches (combined checks) require professionals to have skills in analysis and knowledge of programming.

Skills and competencies in demand in 2025

To understand whether it is worth studying to become a tester in 2025, it is necessary to consider the skills that will be in demand by employers. Technological advancements lead to increased requirements for QA specialists.

Basic competencies:

  1. Testing methodologies — understanding SDLC, STLC, test design (Boundary Value Analysis, Equivalence Partitioning, etc.).
  2. Working with bug tracking systems — JIRA, TestRail, Redmine.
  3. Basic programming knowledge — Python, Java, JavaScript.
  4. Working with SQL — queries for database testing.

Advanced skills for competitiveness:

  1. Automated testing — Selenium, Appium, Cypress.
  2. API testing — Postman, REST-assured.
  3. Containerization and CI/CD — Docker, Jenkins, GitLab CI.
  4. Software security — OWASP, vulnerability testing.

Relevant programming languages

Programming knowledge is becoming an important requirement for testers. In 2025, preference is given to languages such as:

  1. Python — the best choice for test automation due to its simplicity and powerful libraries.
  2. Java — used in large projects, especially with Selenium.
  3. JavaScript — applied in frontend testing with Cypress and Playwright.
  4. C# — used in corporate products (Microsoft, Unity).

How much do testers earn in 2025

Before deciding whether to study to become a tester in 2025, it is important to study the data on specialists’ salaries. The amounts depend on experience, level of qualification, and region of work. Current data:

  1. USA: $80,000 — $120,000 per year.
  2. Europe: €40,000 — €90,000 per year.
  3. Russia and CIS: 100,000 — 250,000 rubles per month.
  4. Asia: $30,000 — $70,000 per year (depending on the country).

Manual testers earn on average 30% less than automated testing engineers. For example, in Russia, a Junior QA Manual earns 100,000 rubles, while an automator with the same level of knowledge earns 140,000 rubles.

Pros and cons of the tester profession

Analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of working in the testing field allows for an objective assessment of the career choice’s prospects. The level of competition, growth prospects, and job nature determine how comfortable it is to work in this area.

Career Pros: Is it worth studying to become a tester in 2025

Testing engineers get the opportunity to quickly enter the field of information technology without a deep technical education. The entry threshold remains relatively low: mastering the basics takes from four to six months, making this profession accessible to beginners. Companies are interested in specialists capable of quickly identifying errors, testing software functionality, and ensuring its quality. The demand for testers in the market remains stable because without quality control, it is impossible to release a digital product that meets user requirements.

Career prospects open up opportunities for transitioning to automated testing, DevOps, programming, or project management. Developing skills in related areas increases income levels and expands professional opportunities.

Cons of working as a tester

High competition among newcomers creates challenges at the start of a career. The number of vacancies for Junior QA is limited, and the requirements for candidates are constantly increasing. Having basic knowledge does not always guarantee employment, so novice specialists have to additionally study automated testing and work on creating a portfolio.

The nature of the work involves performing repetitive tasks. The process requires attentiveness and meticulousness but includes many routine operations, which can reduce motivation. Automation partially solves this problem, but without learning programming languages and mastering specialized tools, it will be difficult to do so.

Where to study to become a tester in 2025

Online courses, university programs, and internships are available for mastering the profession.

Online courses:

  1. Coursera (Software Testing and Automation).
  2. Udemy (Complete Software Testing Bootcamp).
  3. Skillbox, Otus, Netology (Russian-language courses).

Certifications:

  1. ISTQB Foundation Level (international standard).
  2. Certified Selenium Automation Tester (automated testing).

Practice and internships:

Lex
  1. Google, Microsoft, Yandex, EPAM offer programs for beginner QAs.
  2. Open-source projects (GitHub) allow you to build a portfolio.

Is it worth studying to become a tester in 2025: conclusions

The growing software market, the need to test new technologies (AI, cloud services, blockchain), and the high demand for QA specialists make testing a good career opportunity. However, success in the profession requires continuous development, learning automation, and working with modern tools. Newcomers need to consider competition and choose courses that provide practical experience and a real portfolio.

The answer to the question of whether it is worth studying to become a tester in 2025 is yes if you are ready to master new technologies and develop professional skills.

The software testing process sets a clear quality structure at all stages of development. Proper organization allows for quick error detection, risk minimization, and the release of stable products. Understanding the software testing life cycle opens the way to efficient work for testers both in the office and in online teams. Here, speed and accuracy become key factors for success.

Understanding the Software Testing Life Cycle

Software testing stages form the backbone of quality assurance processes in development. Involving this process in the early stages of SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle) eliminates up to 85% of potential defects before release.

Gizbo

Software diagnostics combine quality checking methodologies, error correction, and final product validation. Effective implementation of this scheme minimizes costs for bug fixes in later stages. The cost of fixing an error can increase by 30 times compared to detection at the requirements stage.

Software Testing Phases: Building a Strong Quality Foundation

The software testing life cycle forms the basis for the stable operation of any digital product. A clear sequence of phases enhances process reliability and eliminates random errors in later stages.

Requirements Analysis

Quality assurance at the initial stage involves a deep analysis of requirements. This process forms the basis for all subsequent actions, influencing development stability. An error at this stage can lead to serious product malfunctions. A vivid example is the Healthcare.gov project, where incorrect requirements in 2013 led to a failed launch with investments exceeding $500 million. Detailed analysis allows for the early detection of inconsistencies, saving resources in the correction stage.

Test Strategy Development

The next stage determines the approaches, methodologies, and tools that ensure quality checking efficiency. QA engineers make decisions on the application of various verification types, including functional and UI testing. A well-chosen strategy guarantees that each product element undergoes comprehensive testing to achieve the project’s stated goals.

Test Case Design

Design involves creating detailed, unambiguous, and reproducible test scenarios. Considering all requirements eliminates critical omissions in the process. According to industry research, well-documented test cases increase the likelihood of defect detection by 40%, reducing the overall testing time without compromising quality.

Unit Testing

This stage focuses on checking individual code units, such as functions, methods, and modules. Diagnosing individual parts of the system allows for quickly addressing local bugs, reducing the workload in subsequent control stages. Early error detection in logic prevents the accumulation of defects in more complex layers of the application.

Integration Testing

The integration stage verifies the correctness of interactions between modules. Improper integration can cause even perfectly functioning components to start producing errors when combined. Timely identification of such defects allows for their resolution before the product is released to the market.

System Testing

This stage ensures comprehensive verification of all functions and processes. It covers performance, compatibility, security, and usability checks. Proper implementation of this stage ensures that the application operates stably under real operating conditions and meets all established requirements.

Regression Testing

Closing the main cycle of checks, this stage aims to prevent the recurrence of old defects after making new changes. Often, the addition of new features or fixes to existing errors leads to side effects. It ensures system stability after all updates, maintaining product integrity and reducing the risk of sudden failures at release.

Software Testing: Key Advantages of Early and Continuous Checking

The software testing life cycle reveals the full power of QA as a professional quality assurance tool. The benefits of software testing include:

  • A 70% reduction in defect correction costs through early detection;
  • Increased customer trust through the release of stable products;
  • Accelerated release of new versions to the market without compromising quality;
  • Legal security assurance through compliance with quality standards.

These factors are supported by Capgemini research, noting that companies integrating QA into the SDLC reduce product time to market by an average of 25%.

The Role of Verification in Software Development

QA teams detect bugs and actively participate in architecture design, technology selection, and user experience optimization.

Development without tight integration of testing turns into chaotic movement in the dark. As the World Quality Report 2023 statistics show, 56% of global companies consider QA a key element of digital transformation.

Completion of the Software Testing Life Cycle

During the operational stage, software testing phases continue to work through stability monitoring, hidden defect detection, and prompt user support. Without proper support, even well-developed software quickly becomes outdated.

Lex

The role of QA engineers at this moment is particularly crucial. They timely identify bugs and defects, enabling quick releases of fixes and updates. In 2023, Amazon released over 1000 security patches based on QA feedback and operational analytics.

Software Testing Life Cycle: Conclusions

The software testing life cycle is not an abstract theory but a specific technology that defines a tester’s professional level. A solid understanding of software testing levels, the ability to quickly address bugs, build scenarios, and analyze results pave the way for a confident career in QA. Without this foundation, a tester misses the chance to join major IT projects.